Spare school places have risen to their highest level since records began, as a combination of falling birth rates and changing patterns of demand reshapes the educational landscape.
Data from the Department for Education (DfE) shows that the number of available primary and secondary places across England exceeded applications by 192,791 for September 2026. This represents a further increase on the previous year, when the gap stood at 187,377.
At first glance, more available places might sound like good news. Fewer pupils can mean smaller classes, allowing teachers to provide more one-on-one support and tailor teaching to individual needs. Meanwhile, empty classrooms can be repurposed into school libraries, IT suites, or spaces for pastoral support. And with more school places available, parents are more likely to secure a school of their choice, reducing the pressures around admissions.
But the real story is much more complicated.
What do the figures tell us?
The increase in spare capacity is being felt across both primary and second education, although the scale of change differs between the two.
For September 2026, available secondary places exceeded applications by 60,553, up from 54,140 the previous year. Primary schools saw an even larger gap with 132,238 more available places than applications.
Alarmingly, the figures point to a longer-term shift rather than a temporary dip. Demographic projections suggest that the pressure could intensify over the coming years with the DfE forecasting that pupil numbers in state-funded primary schools could fall by a further 5% by 2030. Likewise, secondary pupil numbers have fallen in the latest data set for the first time since 2014 and DfE projections suggest these will see a significant decline from 2028 onwards. This suggests that falling rolls could become a defining feature of the education system for years to come.
Why are pupil numbers falling?
The direction of these projections is largely driven by declining birth rates. Recent figures from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) reveals that birth rates in the UK have continued to fall.
But national birth rates only tell part of the story. International migration can have a significant influence on pupil numbers, whilst internal migration, housing development, and the availability of independent school places can all influence demand on a local level.
This means that two schools facing the same national demographic trend can have very different outcomes. One school might continue to attract a strong intake because it sits in a growing community and benefits from a trusted reputation. Whereas another school, perhaps only a few miles away, might struggle with filling its published admission number.
There are already signs that some schools are bearing the brunt of this decline more than others. Research shows that schools with the highest rates of free school meal eligibility have seen pupil numbers fall by around 7.3%, compared with 3.3% among schools with the lowest rates.
This is significant because schools serving more disadvantaged communities often face greater levels of need and therefore require more support. Yet, falling pupil numbers can leave them facing the pressure of rising demand alongside a shrinking budget.
Why do falling pupil numbers matter financially?
Because school funding is closely tied to pupil numbers, a fall in the number of children on roll can lead to a reduction in income, even though many of the costs of running the school remain broadly the same.
A school still needs to heat and maintain its buildings, whilst leadership, administrative and specialist staff remain essential. Moreover, delivering a high-quality curriculum also requires the appropriate resources, training, and technology.
This leaves school leaders with the difficult task of finding savings without allowing the quality of education to suffer. Inevitably, this can bring staffing, support and wider provision under increasing amounts of scrutiny.
Research from the Sutton Trust reveals that 71% of senior leaders have reduced teaching assistant numbers this year, whilst 43% reduced support for SEND, and one-third of leaders cut sports or extra-curricular activities. Sadly, reducing this support is likely to have the greatest impact on the pupils who need it most.
This also creates a wider policy concern. If financial pressures lead schools to reduce the support available to disadvantaged pupils, it could make the government’s ambition to narrow the attainment gap even harder to achieve.
What does this mean for school leaders?
The rise in spare places is contributing to a shift in the wider school landscape. With more places available than there are pupils to fill them, families have greater choice over where their children go to school – and schools have to compete more strongly to attract them.
This year, 97.5% of applicants received an offer from one of their preferred schools, a slight increase from the previous year. Primary applicants were also more likely than secondary applicants to secure their first-choice school.
For parents, the increase in choice is a welcome development. For schools, however, it means competing for a smaller pool of pupils. As the number of available places grows, schools face the increasing pressure to attract families and maintain their intake.
A family’s decision about which school they apply to is influenced by a combination of factors, including catchment area, local transport, as well as recommendations from family and friends. But parental perception also plays a role. Parents want to know exactly what a school offers, what sets it apart, and whether they can see their child thriving there.
This makes the way schools communicate with prospective families increasingly important. In a shrinking market, it’s not enough for your school to simply have places available – you have to give families a reason to want one!
Can school reputation create a downward cylce?
There is also a reputational dimension to declining pupil numbers.
A fall in admissions can sometimes create the perception that a school is struggling, even when the underlying reason is simply demographic. Over time, this can create a cycle where falling pupil numbers negatively impact how a school is perceived by prospective families, which may lead to fewer applications and, in turn, further falls in pupil numbers.
So how can you break the cycle?
How to build a reputation that boosts admissions
Falling pupil numbers are not something individual schools can control. Birth rates, migration and local demographics will continue to shape demand, and in some areas there will simply not be enough children to fill every place available. What schools can influence, however, is how they are perceived by the families who do have a choice.
Remember, parents form impressions long before they submit an application, drawing on what they see online, what they hear from other families, and what they experience when interacting with your school. A strong marketing strategy can give your school greater control over that narrative. So what makes your school stand out?
Whether it’s your unique pastoral provision, strong outcomes, exceptional facilities, or your commitment to inclusion – these qualities can only influence parental choice if prospective families know about them and understand why they matter.
That’s where One Education can help. Our professional school marketing services bring together market research, strategic planning, content, design, and campaign delivery to help schools strengthen their reputation and attract more families as a result.
Ultimately, marketing is about helping schools tell a story that families can see themselves – and their children – becoming a part of. By showcasing what it means to be part of your community, marketing can help parents see your school not only as an option, but as somewhere their child could belong.
If you would like to know more about how we can support your school, please get in touch with our Marketing Team.

